Purely as a political strategy, should President Clinton have resigned his presidential office, in perhaps late September of Y2K?
Had he done so, that would have made AlGore president.
Would incumbency have changed the outcome of the Y2K election? If so, how?
Whether or not so, would such thing be legal? Would it be ethical? Should that matter?
If a president doesn't want to be president anymore, is it wise to compel him to do so anyway?
Had he done so, that would have made AlGore president.
Would incumbency have changed the outcome of the Y2K election? If so, how?
Whether or not so, would such thing be legal? Would it be ethical? Should that matter?
If a president doesn't want to be president anymore, is it wise to compel him to do so anyway?
