No, it is not a GOD issue, although the purpose I proposed does require future events to influence the present, which may appear like divine guidance to some or may be considered as such. But to me it is just a different concept and is Physics. If it is not a GOD issue, then what is the issue. The issue is scientific methodology. Let me explain.
The scientists believe that we have a system called this universe and there are a system of laws obeyed by this universe. These laws you can interpret them as the design of this universe, in the sense that these laws make it tick. Purpose theorist like myself (the first one and only one right now) believe that you have three things, The system (universe), Design (science), Specification (purpose). Purpose theorist believe that the scientist belief that there is no purpose is based on the fact that nobody has it. I made a primitive guess at the purpose, and I think I understand things much better now than before. This is a first attempt at the purpose and may be considered primitive by the future. But I believe future will make further attempts in this direction and greatly refine the specifications of this universe.
What does it get us. It improves the scientific methodology. If you develop a scientific theory right now, the only real test of its validity is that does it explain the observed data and does it contradict anything else. This I believe is a week test. If a theorist has to balance the science (design) with the purpose (specifications), there is a greater chance of dismissing bullshit theories, which will lead to quicker development of science and technology.
The scientists believe that we have a system called this universe and there are a system of laws obeyed by this universe. These laws you can interpret them as the design of this universe, in the sense that these laws make it tick. Purpose theorist like myself (the first one and only one right now) believe that you have three things, The system (universe), Design (science), Specification (purpose). Purpose theorist believe that the scientist belief that there is no purpose is based on the fact that nobody has it. I made a primitive guess at the purpose, and I think I understand things much better now than before. This is a first attempt at the purpose and may be considered primitive by the future. But I believe future will make further attempts in this direction and greatly refine the specifications of this universe.
What does it get us. It improves the scientific methodology. If you develop a scientific theory right now, the only real test of its validity is that does it explain the observed data and does it contradict anything else. This I believe is a week test. If a theorist has to balance the science (design) with the purpose (specifications), there is a greater chance of dismissing bullshit theories, which will lead to quicker development of science and technology.
