Quote:
I make the opposite assumption. I can make any assumptions I want.
Does it seem to anyone else that Jaihakim wants to make assertions, yet shift the burden of (dis)proof onto his critics?
Maybe I'm just skimming because I've almost completely lost interest in whatever he's trying to assert, after his ad hominem dismissal of the peasants and a few other remarks, but if he's going to pretend any interest in scientific method vice religion, shouldn't he at least adhere to a scientific style?
