ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 1755
Jan 9 15 3:38 PM
I was unconcerned with just the Pubbies excessive and quite absorbed with the question posed by the threads topic. I don’t think I am remiss with thinking that Japan might not appreciate a moral crusade imposed on them being lead by--- let’s say A cross??? Of course I was being personal again. Perhaps you don’t care much one way or the other??? I thought it was clearly shown that we, as a separate Nation from all others would have objections if our own Nation was asked to obey another Nation’s moral values.
Posts: 19088
Jan 9 15 6:39 PM
Proprietor
Posts: 8931
Jan 10 15 7:07 AM
Sceptical Observer
When you say “As pointed out above, at least in the West, depictions of the kind we are discussing are already banned here. As well as it being illegal, I also find it offensive (though that is not sufficient reason for me to want something banned).” There is a subtle thought mixed in there that has a cryptic value attached …
And I thought the BBC mag. was only concerned with how Japan was in acceptance of the cartoons… and “Why is it banned here if it is only a matter of "taste" or "individual freedoms"?
I don’t think I am remiss with thinking that Japan might not appreciate a moral crusade imposed on them being lead by--- let’s say A cross???
Posts: 17935
Jan 10 15 9:30 AM
Custodian of Castle Anthrax
I would also say that I make no differentiation between cartoons made from real life - meaning real pictures that have been manipulated to make them look like cartoons - and those drawn from scratch. It is the intention to arouse using images of children that is the issue here.
Molly say:So keep fightin' for freedom and justice, beloveds, but don't you forget to have fun doin' it. Lord, let your laughter ring forth. Be outrageous, ridicule the fraidy-cats, rejoice in all the oddities that freedom can produce. And when you get through kickin' ass and celebratin' the sheer joy of a good fight, be sure to tell those who come after how much fun it was.
Jan 11 15 2:35 AM
one thing that would be difficult to ascertain is 'did the person make the cartoons with the intention of arousing someones Libido', or did they simply produce them with intent on making money, because that seems to be what the public wants.
Jan 11 15 8:25 AM
Jan 12 15 4:41 AM
Jan 12 15 8:03 AM
Jan 19 15 1:13 PM
Padre Mellyrn wrote:This is true, if manufactured in the same place where said art is illegal then those producing and distributing it could be called to task for it.
Jan 19 15 2:50 PM
Jan 19 15 2:54 PM
Jan 19 15 7:35 PM
Share This
The Out Campaign