ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 1755
Aug 29 07 10:48 AM
Sear---You've got it precisely backward Druid. Science must be questioned.
Innovation and critical (sometimes antagonistic) peer review are major cogs in the scientific engine. But questioning scientific assumptions, and acknowledging scientific consensus are two different things.
If you can quote a recognized body of accredited scientists that assert that oil consumption can NOT be reduced, I'll retract my statement. Until then, I stand by it.
The barrier is not scientific possibility, it's economic disincentive, and societal status quo.
You can't possibly disagree with me about that; IF you hold the position you claim. I think we should do more than "attempt" it. I think we should DO it.
To paraphrase Yoda: - There is no try. There's only doing, or not doing. -
Share This
The Out Campaign