ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 115
Aug 29 07 9:53 AM
And while it is perfectly legitimate to address this topic from a scientific point of view (as I have), I doubt you've got the background to do so, from what I've read elsewhere, but I am willing to be shown otherwise
it is equally legitimate to also address it from an ethical, & or moral point of view (as I have). And after I did, you replied derisively, because you disagree.
And in such disagreements, it's perfectly acceptable to attempt to cite the hypocrisy of one's debate opponent, by citing a contradiction between analogous positions (as it seems I have).
Well MG, that's not very bright. It's plain for all to see that your position is to ignore the direct question. And in light of your style, and such redirected pettiness as:
Indicates you're not comfortable with your answer. It doesn't require an Einstein to figure out why.
I know for a fact you did not answer explicitly, which means, in the context of the rest of your post, your implicit answer is fairly obvious. But there's no point in speculating or squabbling about it. You can put an end to all that simply by declaring your position on it.
Or do you prefer bickering; or trying to "win" against an opponent, instead of cooperatively seeking truth & solution through constructive clarity?
Share This
The Out Campaign