I'm not impressed by the -it might kill somebody someday- standard.
Is nuclear power potentially dangerous?
Monumentally!
Does that mean we should use other sources?
Perhaps, if available.
Oddly, I happen to think hydro-electric is one of the better sources of power, commercial & otherwise.
But it seems to me, in the U.S. we're tearing down dams faster than we're putting them up.

Some say coal is the U.S.' most abundant fossil fuel.
But if we apply the -it might kill somebody someday- standard to that, the stats I've read indicate ~50,000 Americans per year die to the health affects of coal fired power plants. That includes, mercury pollution, acid rain, air particulates, etc.

The most ghastly thing about nuclear are its monumental legacy costs.
The nuclear waste we generate today may remain fatally radioactive for many millennia.
So what?

So the electricity we consume in a nano-second carries this string attached. It is a burden that will compel safeguarding from evil-doers, & natural disasters, for hundreds of human generations.
We get the (brief) benefit. THEY get stuck with the burden, virtual zero benefit to them.

I'm not aware of any legitimate standard of ethics or morals that would permit such flagrant exploitation. Are you?
Is anybody?