But, considering he never actually wrote any of his own stuff, I often wonder if the true King of Rock 'n' Roll should have been Buddy Holly?
What should the criteria be, I wonder? There were many contemporary performers who composed/performed their own work and promoted others', and many were as good as or better than Elvis Presley. Was he just marketed more competently? Was it because he appealed to millions of little white girls with allowances and record players?

Mac