Quote:
Gibber drool kerplunk whoops mrs miggins whubble flibadob blib blab bleeb.

Hummmm, Must be a blind illiterate scotsman.

Quote:
“Exactly what has the concept of zero got to do with maths being 'false'?”
Everything, Soar arsey.

Negatives do not exist except from a more positive level - for instance, gravitational energy is of a designated negative sign because science needs a less positive situation to designate below a more positive level, and math is invented to designate the more positive state as the beginning, or opposite of the situation, and math calls it zero. It's clearly an error in judgement for reality does not need such a negative sign.
Gravity is just the opposition to movement. It is balanced and has a force only when accelerating against the static situation of those particles around the moving particle.
It is the static stagnation of no movement which is mostly the situation.

Imbalance is the creator of particle movement, and more Positive moves towards a less positiveness and that’s tha truff.

All formulas that show positive energy as (+) and negative energy as (-) are incorrectly shown, and science should recognize this false symbol, or admit the existence of a master designer after all.

But it is you that points that out, by your acceptance of this fact. That if a automobile needs a designer to create it, then why not an orange tree?

They each start with the “nothingness” that science proves exists, or are you privy to which came first? The orange seed, or the orange tree?