Quote:
Rambo – The eyes are open, the lips move but Mr Brain has long since departed, hasn't he, Baldric?
Rambo – Why do I get the feeling I've been totally ignored? "
Rambo – Steve. You've got your head stuck in the sand - or wherever else the sun doesn't shine!”
That is how it feels sometimes, Baldric, but AH! “WTF”
There is always a little bit of sunshine here in the alley, and too, there is the brilliancy scribbled on the walls of the alley.

The problem is, too often, finding the correct order of the scribbled remarks.

Just take this little tidbit, Rambo.
Quote:
Rambo – “Steve, you're a mindless drooling simpleton with no more wit than a slug.
You're a troll, and incapable of independent thought.
You bring up the same shite over and over and ignore any rebuttals whatsoever.”
“Why having I destroyed the bullfrog?”
What bullfrog, Rambo ... I don’t see a bullfrog, ,but I do wish you would learn how to spell “shit”.

Today I find this, and wonder what does it mean.
Quote:
“Druid, even when we manage to wade through your grammatically-challenged posts and try to understand what exactly you have tried to say, what we find you saying makes no sense.”
“What's the fucking point in coming here and bombarding us with bullshit?
Was that your frog?
Also this...
Quote:
“You should know by now that we're far too well educated for these creationist lies to do anything more than annoy us.”
Let me try to explain what I said above, Rambo.

I will strive to use grammar in an atmosphere conducive to the stench of the lyrics found here in the alley just for you. Old Top!

But “WTF” I just noticed this fantastic bunch of bull shit ...
Quote:
Rambo– “We actually understand radiometric dating, geology and fossilisation, and we're well read on the subjects of paleontology, anthropology and such.”
Opinions written in completed textbooks fall below the comment, as most minds are locked into the truths of those that author such texts.
They let go of their own reasoning, and swallow whole hardly the author’s interpretation to sway them to his/her train of thought because of the proofs accepted, by the scientific method of peer approval.

In other words.... Those that read, and buy into the written opinions of the author of any completed textbook relieves their selves of free thinking abilities. MO
Quote:
Rambo – “Mathematics is based on false evidence? Religion is based on "scientific" writings? WTF? Is it any wonder we go "Oh no, it's just Druid on another bad trip again. Ignore him and maybe he'll go away,"?
We're not dodging the questions, we just don't understand WTF the point of what you're trying to say is.”
“WTF” Rambo.
It is as plain as the scribles written on the alley walls.

Mathematics recognizes a false zero point, and erases the a basic truth. That truth is that there is only positive existence, and math needs to dip below zero to prove the existence of the acceptance of a preexistence of no thing existing before the Big-Band. Created all thie
The use of a false zero count is where math is in error.

Positive electricity will go negative into a lower positive count, but would never dip into a true negative ion count because a negative ion count does not exist.

Mathematic texts designate a positive count, as the zero point, to satisfy a positive observation.
Negative observations of existence are not available so one is imagined, by science, and students are taught to buy into the false mathematical erroneous logic.

This false education depicts a false universe that the physical universe is expanding into. :lol

The theory is wrongly based on a false scientific assumption that invents the false zero count, complete with a proveable ability to remove the zero point by removing its dimentions.

It is a false assumption, and falsely used.

While it is correct to show that existence is only positive physical existence complete with a solid physical covering.

Closed existence of one universe. Or: “WTF” It is a relic of past religiously inclined scientific endeavors that decided the Bible was written by a spiritual God, and the continuing scientific assumption still confuses sciences, astronomy, and so forth, as it continues to preach of a spiritual realism outside of the physical reality.
At the same time continuing to preach that such an existence is not possible...
Which is correct?
Boggles me mind it does!

PS. – Reread this as often as it takes to understand it, bozo.

It is written on the alley walls.