Quote:
Druid, it's not that no one has the balls, its that no one knows what you're talking about again. Chalk it up to ineptitude if it makes you feel better
Mac, I really don’t think its incompetence. More then a desire to rather rumble then agree. What is so hard to analyze this sentence?

There are two sides that insist that they are correct in their analysis.
One group says that there is one supreme Deity, or God.
Another group says there are no deities of any kind.
Others seem to be blinded by either argument, and just accept the status quo.

I disagree with all three groups, and if what you are saying is true about the posters abilities, then finding no one qualified to argue against me...well.... I can always just argue with myself.
What is so hard about that?

All I am stating so far is that those that argue for God rely on written scientific texts, and those that argue against God do so from written scientific texts.
The arguments get overwhelming, and all due to outdated texts.

The Bible is designed to deceive men into believing the church’s doctrines , and mathematical science is also designed to deceive, but in the disbelief of the church’s doctrines.
The one God is replaced with one theory, by proving the stuff that God is made of is a reality using math, as it’s proof.
Reality teaches using insinuations, and it belief is an insinuations only requirement.
Besides... What is left to debate about Bush’s administration?.

Math is based on false evidence same as the church is based on false witness.
Same as Bush’s administration is based on false evidence.

If it is no bother?
I would like to just write on the alley walls here behind the pub.

Anyway ... Sooner or later the whole RDF threads will be delegated to the alley!