Quote:
“If you must know, I think you're (at worst) an inept, imprecise, emotion-driven debater, and (at best) someone desperately trying to clarify an apparently very individualistic mysticism in what may be an inappropriate venue”.

Mac “ inappropriate venue” ...?... Is this NOT the place where believers/atheist debate their mysticisms?

My methods of debating the particular subject, and I define that subject as:
arguing the existence/nonexistence of deity, without real proof of support for either sides charge. I agree that it is inept, imprecise, and emotional-driven debating. I hardly accept that the blame is all mine, however!

As far as my individualistic mysticism is concerned I define that as an attempt to show what I define in the venues I have available. An example that faith in one personal beliefs is all one has. I loose when I expect to be heard in an equal manner by either side concerning theists/non-theists forums.

If I set up shop in a religion forum I am chastised just as much as a non-believer in God!
If I set up shop in a atheists forum I am chastised just as much as a believer in God!

My message is plain in any forum... It is Reality is all there is, and it is three realities in one!
The primary reality of particle dust, the illusion reality of change, and the imaginary reality of being able to create from the dust of the first, using the imagination of the third, an unchanging, and lasting reality in an ever- changing situation. ... but that’s a just me! :lol .

But thank you for the opportunity to get that said! :)