Druid,

When you make claims in an argument, it helps greatly if you distinguish what is scientifically proven and what is an opinion you thought up yesterday. The fact that you present the latter as the former means that it's hard to trust anything you write.

Yeah, I did alter the thread a bit. I thought I made a fairly interesting point, and you yourself seem to have found it worthy of responding to (even if you now seem to have reverted to saying it was "not meaningful"). Now, for the part of it that you seemed to have misunderstood:

Quote:
I still call Caelia’s post in error for the chances are pretty good that both tribes would have some form of religion also!
Some form, probably, same form, no way. That was my entire point. Religion and science are both documented by man, but one of them seems dependent on who documents them, whereas the other does not. Get the idea?

Christianity has nothing to do with it. It happened to be a convenient example. I have to say, though, that I'm not sure why you're on my throat about having used Christianity as an example, when you've done that yourself?