(RB)-It is irrelevant anyway - you're twisting away from the issue again.
(D)- …?…
(RB)-Your question says "quit".
(D)- …?…
Rambo, While I agree with your post completely.

I must take some issue with your insinuations that I was asking when humans stopped cloning, or, that I believe that cloning was the initial state … I was, actually, using an example of what I truly believe to be the truth.
Much as you are with “It never was. In fact, I doubt it was for any vertebrate from what I know of paleontology.” I wouldn’t give a wooden nickel for your opinions. The idea that I retrieved the information from was Scientific American, and the copy has long ago vanished. It spoke to the subject of cloning, and to the original of all species being female, but you will need to take my word for that, and I know you can not do that!
K-SA-RAH!
(RB)-That some freak mutations have managed to get some species to revert to cloning is another matter entirely.
(D)- I would ask you to clear up what you believe with the words “revert to cloning” if you cannot accept that they started out as cloned from a single mother?

I am curious, as to what you do believe in, Rambo!
Your personal Bio Reads ;

“I AM AN ATHEIST! This notice is for those idiots who keep asking stupid questions. You know who you are!”

I suppose, it is your most fondest wish is that I am stupid.
That’s not it Rambo, but you are very confusing to me.

Please forgive me if what I am asking is offensive to you, but since you seem to hold the human above all other other animal species, like they are somehow separated from the rest of the animals, and not subject to natural evolutionary processes.

My curiosity stems from your insistence that humans did not evolve like everything else did.

To me, the time difference between the mammals, and reptilian states of the mammals shows very little difference when it comes to evolution.

I suppose my new question, if we must continue this?

Is…Will the real Rambo, please stand up?