(RB)-In any case, how can you DIVIDE into a unity??

(D)-John asked us to define inconclusive proof with “I may be being dim here, and I'm sure that someone will point out that, if so, but is there such a thing as an inconclusive proof?”

I was answering his question with “Catastrophes made changes, but there should be a steady progression along the way?”
For example: When did the human creature quit cloning, and divided to the male/female unity?

It is easy to see the inconclusiveness in the revised question that was created by (RB) with his quote of (FR)’s rendition…
However, The division is simple, as it is a Perfectly Norman everyday expectations that a man and a woman are counted as a divided pair, within the conception of another human.
Of course it’s easy to see what the problem is for you guys have a hard enough time with this simple math example of the same thing 1+1=’s 3 after somewhere in the neighborhood of say 9 months later.
Again that is if the term was not in some form of a multiple. Then the answer could be as high as 4, or 5 more than that is considered highly unlikely, or is way out of the norm!

There, That explains it nicely!
MO!

PS-- I serched, and found this site, Rambo, and anybody else thats interested.

Go to
animal.discovery.com/convergence/lizards/dads/dads.html