Quote:
Druid, that is YOUR dumb question, not mine.
Or rather, it is gramatically constructed as a question but it is nonsensical.
It is a non-question. I'm not even the first to point it out.


Hummmmm,,,,, I’m not surprised at this post. After all, you did mention you have a “stupid” disorder.


“I mean, exactly wtf is that idiocy supposed to mean? If you're going to spout gibberish, are you really surprised I lose my temper? And if you are going to keep on drooling such gobbledeygook, how can you expect any respect from me or anyone else?”
Hear, Dewdrop, Have a cup
This could take a spell, , or two even!
“I'm not even the first to point it out.”

The scenario went like this, folks! I was giving a brilliant example to why I thought biological books fell short when describing the fossil records as inconclusive.

Rainbo’s stupid question concerning, my perfectly acceptable rendition demonstrated his inferior abilities of his created designs.
The ones alluded to several times, and now again.

-----

Rainbo (RB)- Insists on mooning us, so be it! ---

Druid (D)-Catastrophes made changes, but there should be a steady progression along the way?
For example: When did the human creature quit cloning, and divided to the male/female unity?

Ballsafire (Baf)- :eek :lol :lol :lol
:!

(D)-Completely ignoring the more interesting topic of virgin births.
“Science is always imitating nature in only one method, while nature has billions of ways to do the same thing. That is considered a fact until progress shows an easier way to do something, then a new fact rears it’s ugly head.
Example… Virgin birth is now considered a reality, errrr fact to you guys”
Which I thought was a much more interesting topic of Atheists concerns?

(D)- (Mac…. I KNOW! … I Know! … I know! … it’s just me!)

Phill Phree (PP) Try’s to out P us all, with his self serving theses, or log of historical events?
It did get confusing?

(Baf)- asks PP to send a # to his exterminator!

(D)- ???

(RB)- “Sticks and stones? Who needs them? I'll use my bare f*cking hands.

You want to antagonize me? Antagonize me, mother.fucker! Get in the ring motherf.ucker and I'll kick your bitchy little ass, punk!


There, got that off my chest. I think Phil and John et al have said the rest

(D)- (RB)’s opinion if you ask me!

Clint55 © Sails across the forum with “Your thinking is quite clear Phill, but if you start to "understand" Druid you could end up muddled.”

(Mac ))))KISS((((( us with a cute little ‘stop it, yous guys!’

John (J)-adds his 2cents with “Perhaps Druid could give some examples of inconclusive proofs then. I still don't know what one is.”

(PP)- Anything that doesn't answer things to his satisfaction is inconclusive to him.

(PP)-Oh shit. Clint, get me your shrink :-)

(D)- Gets hot, and really lays it out plain like!!!!!!

(PP)- Wets a line near his foots, between him, and (D) that (D) steps across with;

(PP)-“ Anything that doesn't answer things to his satisfaction is inconclusive to him.
(D)-Sticks and stones? Who needs them? I'll use my bare f*cking hands.

You want to antagonize me? Antagonize me, mother.fucker! Get in the ring motherf.ucker and I'll kick your bitchy little ass, punk!”
(worked for (RB) ???)

(PP)- You just stepped over the line.

(D)- ?????

(RB)- There's only so much patience one can have with the wilfully ignorant. When the student refuses to accept reality, a severe beating may not remedy the problem, but will help alleviate stress in the teacher.


Quote:

When did the human creature quit cloning, and divided to the male/female unity?



When you can understand what is wrong with your above question, and why it is a non-question, perhaps I will stop treating you with contempt. You have demonstrated time and again you have no understanding of the science you refuse to believe in. I have already shown that, before you deleted all your own posts in a tantrum. How many states of matter are there, Druid?

Tell me why I should stifle the urge to beat into a bloody pulp a man who thinks the creation account in Genesis should be treated as a factual account in the same way as a geological textbook?

Personal opinion may have a bearing on conclusions drawn from the known facts, where these are incomplete, for instance, but personal opinions cannot change the known facts! No matter how strong your opinion is it is utterly irrelevant if it is not in accordance with the facts. The myth of the Tower of Babel is not in accordance with fact - ergo, it is, by definition, untrue.

(D)- Speechless…. A…

(PP)- I am, actually. Of the earlier stuff anyway. Slash's Snakepit are superior to anything Axl did after they split.

(D)- Yeah, What (PP) said!

El Stevereno (ES) ))))THANKS((((

(RB)- The man refused to debate and constantly tried to side step the point. I'm perfectly happy to discuss the subject with him as soon as he learns something about it and starts talking about it. If he continues to ask questions about when humans stopped acting like hermaphrodite amoebas and started having sex, I'll simply point out his monumental ignorance. If someone is stupid, calling them an idiot is not an insult, it is merely an accurate description of the person in question. If a man is 5'4" and weighs 27 stones, is he not short and fat?

(D)- ????????

(D)- Picks a few bones to snack on, and asks a simple question that (RB) should bwe able to cope with. … :?

(D)- Be a good chap, and clarify what it is you don’t fully understand?

(I even called on a few friends to sooth over the stiff English atmosphere that had infiltrated the pub!)

(D) Dit help? Hell NO

(ES)- Thanks, but the situation appears to be hopeless. A normal condition when dealing with extreme Atheists, or Extreme Fundamentals.

(RB)- Druid, that is YOUR dumb question, not mine.

(D)-It’s hard to tell anymore, but the question only appears to be dumb to those that cannot decipher it!

(RB)- Or rather, it is gramatically constructed as a question but it is nonsensical.

(D)- I figured you’d see it that way!

(RB)- It is a non-question.

(D)- well (RB) Is it or isn’t it a question?

(RB)-I'm not even the first to point it out.

(D) – Let’s us not go in to that again…OK?

(RB)- I mean, exactly wtf is that idiocy supposed to mean?

(D)- It was an example! …?…

(RB)- If you're going to spout gibberish, are you really surprised I lose my temper?

(D)- Actually you do it quite often :lol

(RB)- And if you are going to keep on drooling such gobbledeygook, how can you expect any respect from me or anyone else?

(D)- HOCKY-PUCK! ---I have laid out two questions trying to get a commit, as to what was your question, about the question, that you claim is a non-question!

(D)- …???