Quote:
but was just exaggerating to show that I think the source CAN matter.
I'm perfectly fine with exaggeration, i must have used it a million times to demonstrate a point. But unless you're wilfully channeling drug lord funds to launder them, like accepting $9,999.99 checks in the till and using it to hire mob-owned garbage collectors for $5,000.00, thereby actively breaking the law, accepting charity to use for the purposes your charity was established is not wrong.

I wilfully maintain that money has no will power, money itself cannot sin, (although $20's tend to test positive for cocaine these days), and legal transactions of money are without stain. Now, if he was offering a donation with a demand that they change the christmas colllection bells to zithers, that'd be different. Or if he demanded that the money be spent on anyone except blond prostitutes...